Peter Ticktin is a successful Florida lawyer and longtime friend of President Donald J. Trump. Ticktin was also Trump's former platoon sergeant at the New York Military Academy.

Recently, Ticktin, aided by Associate Deputy Attorney General Ed Martin, Trump's US Pardon Attorney and Weaponization Czar, with the pardons of Trump lawyers, legal advisors, and the 2020 alternate GOP electors in several swing states that were targeted by the lawless Biden regime.

On Sunday afternoon, Independent Election Integrity Investigator Peter Bernegger shared a bombshell post on "X" featuring a video of Peter Ticktin.

In a segment on Real America's Voice, Ticktin can be seen claiming he has evidence that the Dominion voting machines used in Michigan's 2020 election contained "phone chips" mounted on the motherboards.

Ticktin was referring to the case brought by Michigan's dirty Attorney General Dana Nessel against her former AG opponent, Matt DePerno, in the 2022 election, former conservative State Representative Daire Rendon, and against former Wayne County Prosecutor Stephanie Lambert, who became an expert in election law during the hotly contested 2020 election results in Michigan.

DePerno, Lambert, and former state Rep. Daire Rendon are facing charges connected to a 2021 effort to examine Dominion voting equipment. However, all three maintain their innocence and have not been convicted of any wrongdoing.

According to the state's allegations, five tabulators from Missaukee, Roscommon, and Barry counties were taken to Oakland County—at locations including a hotel room and a private residence—where outside technicians conducted tests and accessed the internal components of the machines.

Prosecutors say DePerno and Lambert were present at various points during the examinations and that Rendon helped facilitate access by reaching out to local clerks.

However, the defendants dispute the characterization of their roles. When the equipment was returned, officials reported broken security seals and damage to at least one machine, prompting the state to bring charges such as conspiracy and unauthorized access.

The defendants argue their actions were lawful, part of an effort to address public concerns about election integrity, and that the state is mischaracterizing the events.