Article Image

News Link • NATO

Rutte Says Post-Ukraine Peace To Include NATO Boots By Air, Land & Sea

• https://www.zerohedge.com, by Tyler Durden

Rutte said Ukraine needs binding commitments and security guarantees in order to prevent future Russian aggression. This is to include the deployment of European forces and a "crucial" US "backstop". His words are consistent with the Western position - and specifically the European view - on what a final Ukraine peace deal would require.

The Kremlin has as expected consistently rejected this 'option' as a non-starter, given this is why Russia went to war in the first place: to stop a NATO troop outpost right on its border, and constant NATO expansion.

What Moscow will find doubly alarming is that Rutte issued the words directly before Ukraine's Verkhovna Rada (the unicameral parliament of Ukraine). Other NATO states, Rutte laid out, would continue to assist through additional channels in a support role to Western boots on the ground.

But Russia has again warned that foreign boots on the ground in Ukraine would warrant a military response, and that they could be targets for future Russian action. All of this contradicts Russia's 'red lines' for what it says is acceptable.

Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has been even more blunt, stating that security guarantees for Ukraine based on "foreign military intervention on some part of Ukrainian territory" would be unacceptable to the level that a post-war "peacekeeping" mission would fast spiraling into the next flashpoint.

According to more of Rutte's words, summarized via The Guardian:

Rutte also urged for more equal "burden-sharing" as some allies "are doing a lot" and a few are "doing nothing". He stressed the positive contributions of countries including Norway, Holland, Germany, Denmark, Canada and Sweden.

Rutte said Russia's full-scale invasion, launched in February 2022, was "crazy" and said its continuing assault on Ukraine is targeting civilian infrastructure, creating "chaos" for innocent civilians.

Rutte said Ukraine is ready "to play ball" and come to a deal – acceptable to Kyiv – with the Russian side, but added that the massive Russian attack last night was a "really bad signal" ahead of future negotiations.

Yet, Russia will not "play ball" on these terms, and this signals that US-Russia negotiations continue to be stuck, going nowhere substantial, but the reality remains - at least the two sides are being candid and are communicating.

1 Comments in Response to

Comment by PureTrust
Entered on:

There is a lot to consider. But, seems to me that the 1991 agreements that NATO made with Russia have been broken by NATO. Look at NATO expansion over the years, and the fact, presently, that Ukraine is being considered for NATO membership. To be fair, it might be that Russia broke their part of the agreements in ways that are not expressly seen. However, Russia has not really expanded like NATO has. So, it would seem that NATO is the agreement breaker here. | Search on "Who financed the Bolsheviks" to see that it has been the West all this time that has been trying to steal Russia from the Russians.