IPFS News Link • Gun Rights
-
Special Editions
- Global
- Due Diligence
- Love Bus Liberty Tour
- Vaccine Education Summit
- Bitcoin Summit
- US-Arizona
- US-Tennessee
- Ernie's Favorites
- THE R3VOLUTION CONTINUES
- "It's Not My Debt"
- Fascist Nation's Favorites
- Surviving the Greatest Depression
- The Only Solution - Direct Action Revolution
- Western Libertarian
- S.A.F.E. - Second Amendment is For Everyone
- Freedom Summit
- Declare Your Independence
- FreedomsPhoenix Speakers Bureau
- Wallet Voting
- Harhea Phoenix
- Black Market Friday
IPFS News Link • Gun Rights
Current News | Contents By Subject
Additional Related items you might find interesting:Related items:
Feature Article •
Gun Rights
7mm Rem Mag Recoil: How Does It Compare to Other Magnum Rifle Cartridges?
Feature Article •
Gun Rights
300 Win Mag Recoil: How Hard Does the 300 Winchester Magnum Kick Compared to Other Magnums?
Feature Article •
Gun Rights
350 Legend Recoil: How Much Does It Have Compared To Other Rifle Cartridges?
Feature Article •
Gun Rights
300 PRC Recoil:How Much Recoil Does This Rifle Cartridge Have?
Feature Article •
Gun Rights
3 Comments in Response to Beat the high court: Rule on meaning of Second Amendment
Answer to Brock,
A script on paper gave you the right to drive, with restrictions,pay taxes,purchase anything, etc. However these RIGHTS need no paper to allow us our freedom , they are God given rights which allow us free choice !
Any & All governments are dictatorships which control what we may or may not do with our lives. So, why have a government at all ?
This has worked very well for a small country who has none. Proven!
If a small country can do it, why can't we ?
I for one will never vote for anyone to be able to dictate to me how I should conduct my life, no matter how well intentioned the person may be. My God is the only one I will obey,because he created me which makes him my Father Wiser than anyone in all ways !
The answer is easy and logical. The first 10 Amendments to the Constitution (Called the Bill of Rights) are all rights reserved to the INDIVIDUAL - so therefore, why would one out of ten be collective? It does not follow logically. The Second Amendment must be to the individual.
"Does the Second Amendment give individuals the right to bear arms?"
How can words on a piece of parchment "give" individuals a right? The semantics of the poll fundamentally alter the question before the court.