Judge refuses to allow 'necessity defense' in abortionist murder trial
• APA judge in Kansas says state law doesn't allow a so-called "necessity defense" in the trial of a man charged with killing one of the nation's few late-term abortion providers.
The ruling today was another blow to lawyers for 51-year-old Scott Roeder, who has confessed to shooting Dr. George Tiller on May 31 and says it was necessary to save unborn children.
The ruling today was another blow to lawyers for 51-year-old Scott Roeder, who has confessed to shooting Dr. George Tiller on May 31 and says it was necessary to save unborn children.
Watch Streaming Broadcast Live:
Flote
LRN.fm
DLive
Live Chat
Telegram
Telegram
1 Comments in Response to Judge refuses to allow 'necessity defense' in abortionist murder trial
This is a very good example of the fact that judges see people who use the State owned legal identity name as being a slave belonging to the State.
A slave does not have the right to use the plea of 'necessity' when the 'necessity' is against an 'officer of the State', which a licensed medical doctor is. Just as an enlisted man in the military does not have the right to defend himself against an officer.
Only a ;free will adult man' has the right to use the plea of necessity, and also, it is only a free will adult man who has the duty and obligation under law to defend the undefended from an action of the taking of their life by murder, by a murderer. The crime by not defending in some manner is 'mis-prison of treason'.
But, that does not apply to a slave, unless it is done in disobedience to the will of the slave owner, and it is the slave owner/State which authorizes the murder of innocent and undefended babies in the womb.