A few transplants out of the 28,000 performed every year involve the
same organ spending time in more than two bodies. The most common
scenario arises when a patient in the late stages of a disease receives a
new liver or kidney as a last-ditch effort to keep him alive. If he
dies shortly after, and the new organ wasn’t the cause, re-transplanting
may be an option.
There are a few good reasons, however, why donated organs aren’t
often re-gifted. If the organ is coming from someone who was so sick
that he needed a new organ, it probably lived a pretty rough second
life. What’s more, dying involves the entire body shutting down. “The
trauma of dying can injure an organ,” says Robert Montgomery, the
director of the Comprehensive Transplant Center at Johns Hopkins
University. “And then the second person dies, and the organ is taken out
again. That’s more injury.” But the main problem with playing hot
potato with an organ is the scar tissue that forms on it within weeks
after the first surgery. That tissue must be removed before a second
transplant, and doing so can injure the organ too much to make it worth
re-donating.
But don’t worry: Organs that are suitable for re-transplantation rarely
spend much time in the first recipient, which means less time for scar
tissue to form. So if you’re getting a third-hand kidney, chances are
it’s almost as good as almost new.