IPFS News Link • Justice and Judges
-
Special Editions
- Global
- Due Diligence
- Love Bus Liberty Tour
- Vaccine Education Summit
- Bitcoin Summit
- US-Arizona
- US-Tennessee
- Ernie's Favorites
- THE R3VOLUTION CONTINUES
- "It's Not My Debt"
- Fascist Nation's Favorites
- Surviving the Greatest Depression
- The Only Solution - Direct Action Revolution
- Western Libertarian
- S.A.F.E. - Second Amendment is For Everyone
- Freedom Summit
- Declare Your Independence
- FreedomsPhoenix Speakers Bureau
- Wallet Voting
- Harhea Phoenix
- Black Market Friday
IPFS News Link • Justice and Judges
.... "At first blush, it may seem reasonable that a private business should
be able to refuse service to anyone it chooses," Spence wrote. "This
view, however, fails to take into account the cost to society and the
hurt caused to persons who are denied service simply because of who they
are."
...
Current News | Contents By Subject
Additional Related items you might find interesting:Related items:
News Link •
Justice and Judges
FTX's victims may get all their money back. The judge sentencing Sam Bankman-Fried might not car
News Link •
Justice and Judges
Frank Luntz on CNN: If Letitia James Starts Seizing Trump's Assets...
News Link •
Justice and Judges
Current CEO of FTX Sends Letter to Judge Saying Sam Bankman-Fried's Level of Remorse...
News Link •
Justice and Judges
John Grisham Finds Justice Not in the System, but in the System's Defeat
News Link •
Justice and Judges
Ketanji Brown Jackson Warns Right To Free Speech Could Lead To People Speaking Freely
News Link •
Free Speech
JUST IN: US Supreme Court Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson Just Defended The US...
News Link •
Justice and Judges
Democrat-Darling Rachael Rollins Disbarred After Justice Refuses To Prosecute One Of Its Own
News Link •
Voting: Vote Fraud
"It's Over": Mike Lindell Celebrates Major Evidence In Supreme Court Case
News Link •
Justice and Judges
Judge Sets Precedent Protecting Christian Organizations from Trans Agenda's Funding Demands
News Link •
Hollywood-Entertainment Industry
Hollywood Celebrities Blast Supreme Court Over Trump Ruling
News Link •
Justice and Judges
The Great Election Fraud: Manufactured Choices Make a Mockery of Our Republic
News Link •
Legislative Mischief
Democrats announce bill to kick Trump OFF the ballot immediately after the Supreme Court ruled 9-0
News Link •
Courtroom and Trials
In Unanimous Decision, Supreme Court Rules Trump To Remain On Presidential Ballots
News Link •
FBI
"This Judge Should Be Impeached": Journalist Catherine Herridge Fined $800 Per Day...
News Link •
Courtroom and Trials
4 Comments in Response to Judge Orders Colorado Bakery to Cater for Same-Sex Weddings
Everything done between people is done by trust. Even the contracts that people make between themselves are at least partially done under trust. Why? Because nobody knows what someone else will do... FOR A FACT!
If the trust is not spelled out properly, judges have the duty of overseeing the trust, whatever the trust may be. It's under the phrase "constructive trust" in the legal dictionaries and encyclopedias. The judges have had this power for a long time. It's just that they have limited their exercising of this kind of power, limiting it to take into account the various kinds of laws of the land.
We need to learn how to use contractual trusts to overcome everything that the judges might throw at us. Marc Stevens has been suggesting for a long time that we write right into our contracts, wording that says that this contract exists without (outside of) the laws of any State, or The United States of America, or any and every government of the world.
In the previous paragraph, notice the word "or." In law, the word "and" often means "or" as we normally understand it. And the word "or" means "and." The word "may" means "shall," and the word "shall" means "may." There is good reason for this. But one needs to study a bit of law, and also have a bit of a feel for what is being expressed in general, and how to express it. In general, such switching of meanings does not make sense. But, really it can and does make sense if used properly.
If we want to get out from under judges decisions, we need to operate on contractual trust basis that throws our operations completely outside the authority of the judges' use of constructive trusts. This doesn't mean that the judges won't try to take control. but it DOES mean that we will be showing them from the get-go that we know what we are talking about.
"We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone."
Did this age-old American Tradition of OWNING PROPERTY get Legislated away and the Populous was not informed? I know that the "no firearms" signs on 'supposed Private Property' are being enforced by Uniformed Officers - did this place of business not have one of these disclosures posted and that's why they get ordered by a Judge; or would it have made a difference?
If not, can and armed person sue say, Costco for the hurt to himself, Society, and the individuals who are denied service via a policy of disarmament?
"It may seem reasonable that a private business not subsidized by the state (taxpayers) and indeed set upon by my collegial armed robbers should be able to refuse service to anyone it chooses in the land of the free," the Dred Pirate Spence wrote. "This view, however, fails to take into account the cost to society and the hurt caused to persons who are denied service by someone who does not want to provide them good service in exchange for FRNs. So serve them, bitches! And no spitting in the food."
We are denied important consumer information to make our own decisions as to whether or not we wish to do business with this proprietor or other businesses by government fiat. Fascist markets. And risk taking businesses are under threat of losing a slip of paper acknowledging their servitude to the state (i.e, their business permit). Feudalism at its finest.