Editor's Note: It's one of the ultimate hypocrisies that the UN just met to discuss saving the world with its Agenda 2030 plan when we know that it is bodies like the UN that help keep society down, scientifically stunted, and under the thumb of the cryptocracy. Why do you think solar panels, a technology we've had for decades, are just now reaching widespread prominence? We keep hearing about lots of scientific "breakthroughs" in the media, but in reality they are mostly made in government-funded, government-controlled circles and the truly life-changing (and especially life-extending) technologies never reach the masses… many kept hidden under the blanket of national security.

Look around. Somehow we magically can't seem to bridge the gap between what we all know science and technology can accomplish these days and what people can actually have in real life. Why is that?

by Buck Rogers | Waking Times

Have you ever wondered what the world would be like if better and cleaner energy sources were widely available and affordable to all of earth's people? If so, you're not alone, as the quest for a better energy existence has been the focus of many ingenious inventors, scientists, experimenters and even corporate and government scientists for generations.

We know it's possible, but for some reason, though, society just can't seem to get beyond 23.6 or so miles per gallon on average, highway. The gap between what science is clearly capable of and what is available to the consumer mass market is extraordinary, and here really is no need to be using up the world's fossil fuels at building nuclear plants as if there were no tomorrow, but we do.

The truth is there for those whom have eyes to see. Tremendous market forces and capital involved in government and in the energy and automobile industries make it practically impossible for any promising energy device or technology patent to emerge as a viable and accessible alternative in the real marketplace, and not just appearing on YouTube or at trade shows as prototypes. Alternatives do exist, but why are they not more broadly available?