Article Image

IPFS News Link • History

Here's What Happened When Ancient Romans Tried To 'Drain The Swamp'

• http://www.zerohedge.com, by Simon Black

Prior to Trajan, Romans had suffered immeasurably, from the madness of Nero to the ruthless autocracy of Domitian, to the chaos of 68-69 AD when, in the span of twelve months, Rome saw four separate emperors.

Trajan was welcome relief and was generally considered by his contemporaries to be among the finest emperors in Roman history.

Trajan's successors included Hadrian and Marcus Aurelius, both of whom were also were also reputed as highly effective rulers.

But that was pretty much the end of Rome's good luck.

The Roman Empire's enlightened rulers may have been able to make some positive changes and delay the inevitable, but they could not prevent it.

Rome still had far too many systemic problems.

1 Comments in Response to

Comment by PureTrust
Entered on:

The difference between Roman law and American law, is the difference between civil law and common law. Roman law never had a jury of the people. Their jury was made up of professional jury people who were set in place by the government, and often were part of the "nobility." American juries are supposed to be made up of common people. The BAR is attempting to convert, over time, American juries into a form of Roman juries. It is being done by finding people who will participate as jurymen on a regular basis. Jury nullification is being limited this way. We, as average, common people, need to get out there and become people of the jury on a regular basis. The jury rules.



AzureStandard