IPFS News Link • Economic Theory
How Can We Restore Freedom And Sound Money In The US & UK? Some Ideas...
• https://www.zerohedge.com, by Patrick BarronIt is to present some commonsense policy changes to attempt to mitigate the economic harm that has been done to Western economies, especially to the United States and the United Kingdom, since the end of World War II.
Please watch Godfrey Bloom and Alasdair Macleod's recent interview with Sonia Poulton.
The video describes the current financial and reputational weaknesses of the West. For a more in-depth analysis of the financial threat to the West, please read any of Alasdair Macleod's weekly essays from the past few months.
In the Poulton interview, Macleod ably describes the financial implications of the West's deindustrialization policies and currency debasement. Bloom describes the reputational damage stemming from the West's "sanctions" against Russia plus the consequences of deindustrialization due to the foolish pursuit of a Green New Deal.
This essay's goal is not to convince the reader of the seriousness of the current situation, which Bloom and Macleod do so well, but rather to present policies that must be changed to stop the destruction of the West's economies and reverse the harm to their reputations. Western nations need to build a reputation for honesty, fair dealing, and adherence to the rule of law in the international arena by embracing free trade and neutrality.
Watch Streaming Broadcast Live:
LRN.fm
DLive
Telegram
2 Comments in Response to How Can We Restore Freedom And Sound Money In The US & UK? Some Ideas...
In the event anyone is having trouble finding the Supreme Court wording listed in the other comment, see the website http://annavonreitz.com/exactoriginalcitation.pdf. It says: "...look in the annotations to the case record..." and "'Inasmuch...' S.C.R. 1795, Penhallow v. Doane’s Administrators (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed 57; 3 Dall. 54, Supreme Court of the United States 1795..." and "This is the actual Supreme Court of the United States which over-stands all inferior courts including 'The United States Supreme Court', 'the United States Supreme Court' and the 'UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT'". --- Most websites that I can find include "the United States Supreme Court" like it was the original "Supreme Court of the United States." Where can I look to distinguish them?
Does anybody have the results of Shepardizing this court case?: US v Minker, 350 US 179 at 187(1956) - ? Supreme Court of the United States 1795 "Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them." http://voidjudgements.net/suedc/constitutionalcaselaw.pdf