"I just got published in Nature because I stuck to a narrative I knew the editors would like" he admits, but now perhaps he knows better, as he states "That's not the way science should work." This is occurring because of the huge competition in their field apparently, which results in papers that are majorly influenced by the biases of the editors who select what gets published from a large pool of entries. A researcher's career depends on his or her work being cited widely and perceived as important, that way they can ensure funding, name recognition, and accolades for their work, Claims Brown.