"The VAERS system is noisy…" -Dr. Steven Rubin creator of medalerts.org

Welcome to our new VAERS Edits Visualization Dashboard:

Click to launch dashboard

In the details VAERS states they do not "generally change" data, but the details as to when and why is very ambiguous as documented below:

You can even see in blurb #4, previous to January 2011 and right after the Harvard Pilgrim Study was published, VAERS did "update" initial reports with follow-up data like death, etc. However as consolation prize to the Harvard Pilgrim Study, VAERS no longer updates with follow-up data generally speaking. However, this is distinctly different from fixing typos and filling in missing fields that should have been addressed during the initial four to six week adjudication process. Close examination of these post publication "edits" proves nefarious willful misconduct rather than honest organic maintenance of a pharmacovigilance system. There is nothing vigilant here, VAERS is straight up fraud and being manipulated to run cover for big pharma. Bobby knows it, and if he doesn't well then he should.