three largest Western countries, America, Canada, Australia and Europe maintain
the most responsible birth rates in the world.
The citizens of those countries practice birth control, which brought
their birth rates down to 2.0 or less in the past 45 years.
Western thinking and intelligent action created stable societies, the rest of
the world roared ahead by adding 3.5 billion in those 45 years and continues
with 80 million, net gain, annually, or 1 billion added every 12 years. And, no end in sight as humans see a
projected 3.1 billion more within 36 years by 2050.
“Most Western elites continue urging the wealthy
West not to stem the migrant tide [that adds 80 million net gain annually to
the planet], but to absorb our global brothers and sisters until their horrid
ordeal has been endured and shared by all—ten billion humans packed onto an
ecologically devastated planet.” Dr. Otis Graham, Unguarded Gates
18 million starve to death (10 million children and 8 million adults; United
Nations Population Statistics) and at least 2 billion live within the “human
misery index” of daily water and food scarcity. Notwithstanding, they keep
reproducing without means, end or understanding.
folks continue adding 80 million annually, so, in order to save themselves,
they export endless millions of their numbers into stable Western countries who
chose 2.0 birth rates. Within the next
two decades, demographers project 50 to 100 million refugees searching for a
new place to land.
the meantime, not one world leader addresses it. Not one Western leader touches the subject.
Immigration remains the “last taboo” right up there with the “Earth is flat”;
“The sun and universe rotates around the Earth” as spoken by the Pope; and
finally, let’s not deal with “global climate change” or the fact that we face
complete “Peak Oil energy exhaustion” within 40 years. If we ignore it, the whole mess will go away.
not on your life!
of us deal with immigration because it not only adds to Canada, America, Europe
and Australia’s final horrific population expansions—the added numbers from the
Third World, when they reach the First World, they quintuple their use of
resources—thus magnifying the carbon footprint, water footprint, resource
footprint and energy footprint. Not by a
little, but by an “exponential growth” factor second to none. Therefore, immigration into the West creates
a nightmare. What might that nightmare
mean? It means the Third World keeps
using the First World for a human exhaust vent.
If the West allows immigration, the Third World will continue exploding
those 80 million annually.
the end, the West ultimately faces duplicating the Third World in
overpopulation and environmental damage.
It won’t be pretty folks.
writer Tim Murray, watching Canada being flooded, wrote, “Once again, someone
claims that any focus on immigration to the United States is a meaningless
distraction. In effect, I am saying that the annual addition of more than 30
million consumers to the third most populous and industrialized nation on earth
is irrelevant. Moreover, since all nations and all global citizens will be
subject to an energy contraction, building walls will not insulate us from that
stance is not credible. If energy deliveries will contract, it is ever more
imperative to contract the number of consumers in America, or at the very
least, prevent the US population from growing. Each additional American citizen
will reduce the per capita share of non-renewable resources. We may not be able
to solve the energy crisis, but surely we can't stand by and allow that crisis
to be accelerated by an indifference to immigration growth.
hope to reduce population levels by a grassroots approach, by building a
"belief consensus" for population reduction among target groups, like
"grandmothers" who are not in the breeding phase of life. But how do
you sell birth control to people who look around and see their own communities
bulge with immigrants, legal and illegal? How do you tell the Smith’s and the
Jones’ that they should not have children when the Sanchez family down the
block is having five?
one of my critics told me, governments are determined to grow the population by
one means or another. If citizens choose not to birth children at a replacement
level, then governments will import them. "I prefer to have my own
children than to outsource that job to immigrants", a reader said. This is
a natural reaction. If you don't reduce immigration, you can't convince people
to remain childless in the interest of population control.
get real. Controlling migration is the most efficient method of controlling or
reducing population growth. "But how does that affect global
population levels?” a reader asked. The answer is that open borders are a
proven fertility stimulant to those countries, which rely on massive emigration
to relieve their population pressures and gain remittance money. The Philippines
and Haiti are a case in point. Migration promotes global population growth.”
Tim Murray puts it into logical perspective.
We cannot and will not survive our current path. I guarantee it; I witnessed it in my world
travels. Canada, America, Australia and
Europe must move this issue to the top of the national conversation—or they
eventually face collapse. That’s a fact! We must strive to write, speak and
multiply our numbers and message.
argue or continue a meaningless dialectic on the issue endlessly and
fruitlessly gets us nowhere. I have
given you the top addresses of all the top media in the past. Use them, write them, call them, speak to
them, agitate to them and maintain your tenacity with your relentless
enthusiasm. You are the Thomas Paine’s,
George Washington’s, Ben Franklin’s, Thomas Jefferson’s, Abigail Adams’, Joyce
Tarnow’s, Dr. Diana Hull’s, Dr. Albert Bartlett’s, Susan B. Anthony’s, Jo
Wideman’s, Dr. John Tanton’s, Madeline Weld’s, Jenny Goldie’s, Tim Murray’s,
Eric Rimmer’s, Brian McGavin’s, Mark O’Connor’s, Marylou Tanton’s and Abe
Lincoln’s of the 21st century.
is your watch, so move out and change history toward a viable planet for your
offer to you and your children’s future:
since all national conversations start at the local level and move to
the national level, please present my name to your local radio show host. Ask them to interview me, along with 35 of my
colleagues, on America’s predicament of adding 100 million immigrants and a
total of 138 million people within 36 years—by 2050. Ask them to question how that many people
will be watered, fed, housed, warmed, transported, educated, medicated, worked,
etc., while maintaining quality of life and standard of living in America. Ask them how our civilization will survive
with a stable environment? I will send
them my 20 part series on “The Impact of Adding 138 Million People to
America”. They can contact me at: Frosty
Wooldridge, Golden, CO, FrostyW@juno.com
. Let’s get this discussion started and move it
to Congress and the White House. We need
to reduce all immigration to less than 100,000 a year instead of the current
1.0 million annually. We can change the
course of history by our actions today rather than becoming victims tomorrow
because we failed to take action.