The Dread Pirate Roberts is a free man.

Like so many who have called for Ross Ulbricht's freedom for the past eleven years, I never fully believed I would see this day. And, like many of us, I have heard all kinds of (ignorant) reasons why I should not be supporting him.

"He's a drug dealer!"

"He ordered a hit on a father of three!"

Neither of these are true. If you want to know what he actually did, and why he was caged for eleven years, here is a place to start.

There is a much bigger issue at stake though, than the particulars of Ross's case.

Sarah Thompson puts it well:

"Ross Ulbricht embodies the most important issues and ideals of our time. He is just a man, human and fallible, and also an icon: the quiet hero, an innovator so threatening to the established order that they had to bury him. To a small group of people, they made him a martyr instead. And, beyond hope, he is free, having faced the darkness.

"Our choices are Ross or Klaus Schwab. We can't have both; any drift towards Schwab washes us over the precipice. We still stand on a knife's edge. But, for this moment, the sun has broken through the murk low on the horizon. Let us not forget our hearts when it sets. The world is still in spin."

The government did not put Ross Ulbricht in prison because he was a criminal. Ross committed no crime against anyone. But he, and the platform he helped to build, did threaten the government's monopoly on crime. And that is why they had to lock him up: To send an unmistakably clear message to anyone else who might think about doing anything similar.

When Barack Obama ordered a hit on a US citizen and his sixteen-year-old son, along with other innocent people, nobody threw him in a cage. And I'd be very surprised to find that any of those who were cheering for Ross's incarceration have likewise called for Obama to be incarcerated for his many crimes.

Too many people are in love with criminals in positions of power. So in love that they can't even recognize what is going on. So let me explain:

Every time you make an exchange with someone, whether you're being paid as an employee, hiring someone to work on your house, or picking up cat litter at the grocery store, the government takes a piece of it.

There's no reason for this, it's just because they can.

If you think there is a reason, if you think that taxation is justified because "we need it to pay for our military… or public schools… or roads!", then I'm going to suggest that you haven't thought this through. Even if you still believe that we need to have someone steal money from people in order to pay for necessary things (and if you do still believe that, I recommend doing a little reading to correct the problem), you cannot reasonably believe that the way in which these things need to be paid for is by taking a percentage cut of every transaction everyone partakes in.