ON AIR NOW
Click to Play
The Associated Press uncritically reported that Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul was excluded from the Iowa forum because, Paul "didn't meet the criteria the groups drew up," including "having an established exploratory c
Roll the bones...Get Busy!
It is so refreshing to see a main stream media article about our next President Ron Paul. Most people don't realize it, but Ron Paul has already won the election and it’s going to be a landslide! Americans are so fired up to actually have a pre
The new Bushist line is that everyone killed by American forces in Iraq is "al Qaeda" – a transparent falsehood belied by the Pentagon's own assessments but mindlessly adopted by almost every corporate media venue, with the exception of
Exposing the shame and duplicity of Big Oil and Big Media
"The Associated Press can now add dictionary mangling to their list of accomplishments and continues to prove that the mainstream media is biased, manipulative, and attempting to take over the democratic process in this country," comments A
The tainted record of the New York Times on its Venezuela coverage
Journalists are challenged every day to make sense of complicated business and economic issues. The Business & Media Institute (formerly the Free Market Project) aims to help the media do that essential job.
Entered By: Powell Gammill
On Monday, March 19, Arizona Republic subscribers across the Valley picked their newspapers up off the driveway, slid off the protective plastic bag, and then, surely, started shaking the paper — looking for its missing sections. [get used to it]
Question: Why wasn’t Republican Ron Paul included in the East Valley Tribune’s story today about the Rocky Mountain Poll on presidential candidates? (send them an email,... or not. Irrelevant is the first word that comes to mind)
Staffers at McClatchy's Washington DC., Bureau -- one of the few major news outlets skeptical of intelligence reports during the run-up to the war in Iraq -- claims it is now being punished for that coverage. Bureau Chief John Walcott
US media job cuts surged 88 percent in 2006 from the previous year, a downsizing trend expected to continue this year, a survey said Thursday. The media industry slashed 17,809 jobs last year, a nearly two-fold increase from the 9,453 cuts in 2005
In a report detailing Rosie O'Donnell's confirmed plans to have 9/11 truthers debate the attacks on The View before she leaves in June, The New York Times has responded by penning an extremely poor attack piece
An indictment of the pathetic corporate print media.
After a number of comments that noted that we didn't have a link for Rep. Ron Paul (R-Tex.). We have fixed that oversight. It definitely wasn't an intentional editorial decision by this part of the MSM to not give coverage to the libertari
Voters trying to sort out their presidential choices aren't helped by debates cluttered with the likes of Mike Gravel on the Democratic side and Ron Paul among the Republicans. If the standard is that any declared candidate is entitled to a podiu
A few days ago we were uncivil to New York Times reporter Jeffrey Gettleman, over his story about Somalia, in which he told readers the little tussle over there was mostly the fault of a bunch of greedy gangsters with inborn anarchic tendencies who
Circulation is hard to maintain when information is free on the Internet. Meanwhile, there are fewer and fewer department stores, which are traditional advertisers in big city papers. And within the newspaper families themselves, an increasing number
It looks like it's official: the US Army think that American reporters are a threat to national security. Thanks to great sleuthing by Wired's "Danger Room" blogger Noah Shachtman, the Army's new operational security guideline
The New York Times decision to no longer participate in the White House Correspondents' Association dinner, first revealed by Frank Rich in his Sunday column, drew support from other Times staffers, but some disagreement from WHCA officials.
Rupert Murdoch's surprise $5 billion bid for Dow Jones & Co., publisher of The Wall Street Journal, faces tough sledding after the company's controlling shareholders said they would block it.
Anyone thinking the declines in circulation should ease when the Audit Bureau of Circulations releases its spring numbers on Monday will be disappointed. According to industry sources, overall daily circulation for the six months ending March 2007
The Washington Post's David Broder seems to sum up everything that's wrong with the class who brought you weapons of mass destruction, the Iraq war and the ever “resurgent” President Bush.
Imus was canned after he slagged a women's college basketball team. Two newspaper columnists were canned from their small-town papers after the 9/11 attacks for criticizing President Bush.
The East Valley Tribune hosted a Libertarian Perspective forum, printed excerpts from it, and were so proud of it they didn't bother to make it available online. Personally I would have liked a recording, but here is the article:
Wall Street Journal and New York Times up to usual tricks attacking independent democratic leaders not subservient to US hegemony
Vanden Heuvel went on to defend the magazine, "The Nation magazine opposed this war from the outset because we understood what a disaster it would be. We never lost our head while too much of the media gave head."
The Post ran the story, but apparently one of their editors (liars) realized this might reveal the holes in War Party claims that these new “EFPs” must be coming from Iran. After all, here, supposedly, is a whole EFP factory just a few miles south of
The estimated $8.2 billion bid includes a $350 million investment by Zell, with the remainder essentially being financed by money the Tribune would otherwise have contributed to employees' retirement plans.
Oh Yeon-Ho firmly believes in the slogan that hangs over the door of his office: "Every citizen is a reporter." It's a motto that has driven him to create one of the world's biggest and most influential "citizen journalism**
"It is the policy of the Washington Post not to publish anonymous pieces," the newspaper declares on page A17 of today's edition. "In this case, an exception has been made because the author -- who would have preferred to be named
