Article Image

News Link • Drugs and Medications

FDA's War on Commonsense Nicotine Regulation

• Activist Post

The logic of harm reduction couldn't be clearer: if smokers can get nicotine without smoke, millions of lives could be saved.

Sweden has already proven the point. Through widespread use of snus and nicotine pouches, the country has cut daily smoking to about 5 percent, the lowest rate in Europe. Lung-cancer deaths are less than half the continental average. This "Swedish Experience" shows that when adults are given safer options, they switch voluntarily—no prohibition required.

In the United States, however, the FDA's tobacco division has turned this logic on its head. Since Congress gave it sweeping authority in 2009, the agency has demanded that every new product undergo a Premarket Tobacco Product Application, or PMTA, proving it is "appropriate for the protection of public health." That sounds reasonable until you see how the process works.

1 Comments in Response to

Comment by PureTrust
Entered on:

People who are using nicotine products to reduce their smoking habit are finding something interesting. Direct nicotine usage doesn't prevent the so-called nicotine withdrawal that they get when they simply stop smoking. This is because the problem isn't nicotine. The problem is the chemicals the tobacco companies saturate the tobacco and cigarette paper with. Nicotine, itself, isn't habit forming. It's the other chemicals that tobacco companies add to get smokers to return to the tobacco products by habit. If nicotine were habit forming, people would become habitual eaters of egg plant, potatoes, tomatoes, and other regular foods - which have nicotine in them. Consider Dr. Bryan Ardis, "The Other "N" Word" at https://thedrardisshow.com/episode-04-10-2024-the-other-n-word.



opensourceeducation.online/